About SoloDallas

     

    Hi, and welcome to my home (I was taught – when studying English in the younger years – that you shouldn’t ever say “my home”: it’s implicit in the word “home”. But this is an informal, friendly place – and so it will stay – so I took the liberty to express it that way).

    This is a place I have long wanted. I have told you about it, several times, in several ways. It’s been in my mind for a long time.

    Why? Because. Because I wanted a window on the world where I could talk to you from. And keep on playing the guitar from. Show you things, with detailed information, in written, video or any possible media format form available to us. I have been studying myself and rock and roll for quite some time now – maybe twenty long but fast years – and I have learnt a few things about both (me, my guitar & rock and roll, actually).

    My name is Filippo F. Olivieri, a perfect stranger and a simple nobody. I was born in Dallas, TX (USA) back in 1968 and I now live in Rome, IT (still an American Citizen). I always liked Star Wars – as a kid and as an adult – and I kind of looked like Harrison Ford at times (yes, I know) so I had called myself “Solo”. Since I love America, I also gave it a little addition and it became – childishly – SoloDallas. So no, it didn’t have any relation to playing the guitar, yet: just a foolish, simple screen name.

    With it – though – I got some recognition some time ago on YouTube, where a few videos of my goofy figure playing rock and roll had gathered some 14 (fourteen) million video views and a few thousands “subscribers”. Now that YouTube channel of mine is lost, but I built this home for me and for all of you who will want to keep on doing this: play rock and roll.

    So who am I? I am a bit of few things. First of all, I try to play guitar. Electric, blues based guitar and some folk (acoustic) guitar. I am also a bit of a gearhead for certain things (mainly, good rock and roll sounding things, among guitars and devices), a geek and a nerd trying to liberate himself of his nerd-ness by means of rock and roll music.  There, that’s me (at least in part, talking music-wise).

    There’s a few more things I want to tell you about my philosophy – I won’t be heavy (I’ll try not to) but I need you to know that this place isn’t about me – me – me. I’d like it to be about you, too.

    This place won’t work otherwise, and I want it to work. Because I like it. I’ve been doing this – this internet rock and roll thing I mean – for years now. 6, probably. Got into it for good (I hope, if I don’t get arrested or shut down again for copyright infringement).

    I’ve put comments an video response features in it for now, but I plan on making some of you “posters” (not posers) here as well, not only me. I don’t want to be playing like if I was in front of the mirror: and at times, I do that. The internet can be good, it’s been good to and for me, I hope it will continue to be so with this other adventure of mine.

    Yours,

    sincerely,

    Fil :)

  • avatar
    #1 written by Johnny
    about 2 months ago

    hey fil, just got me a pair of celestion g 12-65′s :) , should i get 2 more when i get more $, or 2 g12m’s??

    • avatar
      #2 written by SoloDallas
      about 2 months ago

      WELL Done Johnny! I would actually add two G12H30s. Great mix.

    • avatar
      #3 written by SoloDallas
      about 2 months ago

      PS as to say that, you don’t need 4 G12-65s. Especially if you plan on recording yourself, one nice 4×12 would include two G12-65s and either 2 G12Ms OR 2 G12H30s. I am sure the G12H30s were used as well. You would just move the microphone on your speaker of choice given the time of AC/DC sound you would like to record (even MIXING two different speakers with two separate mics for interesting results) and… voilà: ONE single 4×12 cabinet will be doing ALL AC/DC eras! Talking about AC/DC accurate tone on a budget!

      • avatar
        #4 written by Johnny
        about 2 months ago

        Thanks fil :) and yeah that would be cool, but how would it work with 3 different speakers, like how would I set it up…the “x” configuration??

        • avatar
          #5 written by Johnny
          about 2 months ago

          Nevermind, I misunderstood you, I know what u mean :) but is it possible to put 1 g12m and 1 g30 with 2 g12_65, or would that be stupid?

  • avatar
    #6 written by HumanJHawkins
    about 2 months ago

    By the way, Bill from BCS_Guitars on eBay seems pretty knowledgeable, and had this to say when I asked him about options:

    Disc (pancake) & Rectangular (chicklet) capacitors: thin and lower volume
    Orange drop capacitors: more volume and sterile tone
    High quality metal film capacitors: more volume and clean tone with an organic feel
    Oil Filled (paper in oil) capacitors: more volume and warmer tone

    Remember, these differences are very slight when the volume and tone are full open and usually only someone who is very picky about their tone, or is an audiophile, will hear the difference.

    A mod with a DPDT switch could be made but this would be costly and difficult due to the size of the caps we use and the small amount of space inside of an SG. With what you have described for what you are looking for I would suggest our Standard series (modern) SG wiring which uses Mojo Dijon high quality metal film capacitors and a modern gibson wiring diagram. This should give your pickups more volume and a clear tone with little to no change in tone. eBay item# 200619568722.

    Bills harnesses seem reasonable… My guitar isn’t ready for it yet, so I haven’t tried his stuff, but if you are interested it is here: http://www.ebay.com/sch/bcs_guitars/m.html?_nkw=&_armrs=1&_from=&_ipg=

  • avatar
    #7 written by HumanJHawkins
    about 2 months ago

    @OldSchoolRocker666, that should be a hell of a kit, but it will not handle 4-conductor wiring for either coil tap or polarity switching. (Unless you add switches to it too, which may be a good option if you are willing to drill extra holes.)

    I’m not sure what Gibson does to their SGs with built in coil tap… Maybe they rout the wood to a thinner depth, or have custom pots made. The push-pull Alpha pots typically used for coil splitting are too big to fit in the cavity of a stock SG. Can anyone fill us in on options? I wanted to do this at one time too.

    Everyone’s “Holy Grail” is different, but that kit is almost it for me (except for the lack of coil tap/Jimmy Page wiring options). The only thing that would make it better is if it used these for the tone pots:
    http://www.bareknucklepickups.co.uk/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=201

    Some people would prefer a different capacitance rating too, though those look great to me.

    • avatar
      #8 written by OldSchoolRocker666
      about 2 months ago

      I don’t think i would like to drill in my beloved Rosie just for that unfortunatly :(

      I was thinking, 4 conductor, 2 vol/2 tone, bumblebee caps, 500k pots and 50s wiring, i have 2 vol and 2 tone knobs already and a three way swich on the guitar, so for the possibility to be able to experiment and using all knobs i think i would need a kit or something designed for that so i don’t have to drill in the wood, cause that would permamently damage the guitar which i don’t want to, i can change electric components, pickups and the hardware and even refret if needed but drilling unneccecary seems to be too much for my sense :)

      I’am not sure right now, what do you think about this kit then? http://store.rsguitarworks.net/PWVINTSG.html would this one fit alot better for my need?

      This is my SG, as you can see it has 2 volume and 2 tone knobs , http://www.flickr.com/photos/61820664@N05/with/5627317363/ and a 3 way swich.

      Basicly i would need something, preferly a complete kit that is more like ”plug and play” if possible that doesn’t require me to drill in the body or anything else that will permamently damage it.

      What do you think? I may consider to add stuff to the kit or something unless it forces me to drill or change the body of the guitar permamently :)

      Thanks for respond anyway mate! :)

      • avatar
        #9 written by OldSchoolRocker666
        about 2 months ago

        Ouch! I think i must have spammed these questions around on many posts and forgotten i have asked sorry for that everyone i got bad memory really like a goldfish sorry for the spamming questions i’ve made on other posts as well about this :(

      • avatar
        #10 written by HumanJHawkins
        about 2 months ago

        Lol. Didn’t see the invisible reply buttons before… Now I can put this in the right place…

        @OldSchool, you haven’t said why you want 4-conductor pickups yet. Do you want coil-splitting? Unless you are doing that sort of thing, in theory, 4-conductors would just cause you to lose tone (or add noise).

        A standard 2 conductor pickup has a shielded design (one of the two conductors is the shield). With 4 conductors, you have twice the distance, and they are all unshielded. Usually the wires are twisted pairs, which helps, but in theory this would not be as good.

        In practice, it may make no audible difference. I don’t know because there is no reasonable way to A-B the same pickup with different wiring.

        Anyway, if you want to have polarity switch or coil tap, then you need both 4-conductor wiring and one or more switches (Which can be push-pull pots if you can get them to fit). But if you don’t want to do that, then you are better off with 2-conductor wiring, and the RS Guitarworks kit should be great.

        • avatar
          #11 written by Atomic'76
          about 2 months ago

          I agree with you. I had coil taps in my old Explorer and hardly ever used them! I guess it adds versatility to a guitar I think I’d rather just have second guitar with single coil pickups instead. The 2 conductor wiring makes for a much tidier control cavity too.

        • avatar
          #12 written by OldSchoolRocker666
          about 2 months ago

          Lol hi again :)

          Well i’ve heard it could be better for the tone, i don’t know, i can live without it if it ain’t neccecary :)

          But would you recommend the first kit or the second one i linked?

          - Seb :)

  • avatar
    #13 written by OldSchoolRocker666
    about 2 months ago

    Good evening everyone! Just would like to ask if anyone can say if this kit is a good recommendation for those who wish to swapp the entire wiring/harness/circuit in their guitar for a better circuit similar to those Fil is using :)

    http://store.rsguitarworks.net/PREMVINTSG.html

    I’am looking for a complete kit that will give 500k pots, bumblebee caps, allow 50s wiring, 4 conductor and all that typhical harness/circuit , i’am not so good at this so i’am just curius if this will be the proper kit to order or if anyone here could recommend another one through a link, hopefully that can also help other people looking for a similar typhical kit that changes the whole harness/circuit/wiring :)

    Any advices?

    Have a nice evening everybody! :)

  • avatar
    #14 written by rockn roll man
    about 2 months ago

    What are the differences between the SVDS (Ken Schaffer) and the Vega Pro model 63 (it’s like the SVDS of Ken Schaffer in aspect) Dynex? Does the SOUND CHANGE between these?
    Try to explain it to me with clarity.
    thank you

    • avatar
      #15 written by SoloDallas
      about 2 months ago

      We only know what Mr. Schaffer told us that is, the PRO63s sound different and rather lower quality than SVDS.

  • avatar
    #16 written by rockn roll man
    about 2 months ago

    Fil, what do you think if I buy the second item on this web page?http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_nkw=vega+wireless+&_trksid=p5197.c0.m627

  • avatar
    #17 written by Atomic'76
    about 2 months ago

    The JMP is in!!! :)
    Had a little scare there when I turned it on and there was no sound but my amp guy took a look and there was a loose wire.
    The first night I had it all I got to do was look at it! lol
    It’s roaring now though! ;)

    • avatar
      #18 written by Johnny
      about 2 months ago

      Videos??

      • avatar
        #19 written by Atomic'76
        about 2 months ago

        Videos of the new rig?

        • avatar
          #20 written by Johnny
          about 2 months ago

          videos of a cover or something lol

          • avatar
            #21 written by Atomic'76
            about 2 months ago

            haha!! Maybe this weekend. I’ve been working on “Gone Shootin’” so maybe I’ll give that one a try. Just a few wrinkles left to iron out on the solo but I may just try and hack through it anyway. lol

  • avatar
    #28 written by Johnny
    about 2 months ago

    Just recieved my “simple aint easy” shirt :)

    • avatar
      #29 written by Ant
      about 2 months ago

      congrats Johnny, wear it proud!

      get some vids on the go i wana see you play! :D

      /../

    • avatar
      #30 written by SoloDallas
      about 2 months ago

      Congrats :)

      • avatar
        #31 written by Johnny
        about 2 months ago

        thanks guys, and will do ant :)

  • avatar
    #32 written by Johnny
    about 3 months ago

    hey fil, what exactly do you use the 11r for?? I mean, you record your covers with an actual amp, so whats the point of the 11r??

    • avatar
      #33 written by Ant
      about 3 months ago

      experimentation my dear friend :)

      • avatar
        #34 written by Johnny
        about 3 months ago

        experimentation for what lol, i mean is it worth getting if im gonna record with a real amp??? Does the 11r add any sound to the recording??

  • avatar
    #35 written by Atomic'76
    about 3 months ago

    1978 JMP 2204 on the way…
    I’ve been losing sleep over this thing!
    Gonna have to be patient for the coming week. ;)

    • avatar
      #36 written by Ant
      about 3 months ago

      congrats :)

      • avatar
        #37 written by Atomic'76
        about 3 months ago

        Thanks man! The guy is shipping it today. It’s gonna be a loooong few days ’til it gets here… lol

        • avatar
          #38 written by Johnny
          about 3 months ago

          whered u get yours atomic, ebay?

          • avatar
            #39 written by Atomic'76
            about 3 months ago

            No on Kijiji. I live in Quebec and am getting it from a guy in Ontario. Has the original slip cover and everything! He’s also sending me a bunch of spare tubes and stuff.

          • avatar
            #40 written by Atomic'76
            about 3 months ago

            He has a road case that holds a 4×12 and a head that is included but shipping was too much for everything. He’s gonna hold on to it for me in case I decide to take it later.

            • avatar
              #41 written by Johnny
              about 3 months ago

              awesome dude. congrats :) , ill be getting mine in about 2 or 3 more months :)

              • avatar
                #42 written by Atomic'76
                about 3 months ago

                Congratulations man! I hope those 2-3 months go by fast for you! lol
                I just reloaded my 4×12 with Greenbacks too so I’m ready to go! The cab sounds awesome so far with my JCM 800.

                • avatar
                  #43 written by Johnny
                  about 3 months ago

                  let me know how the jcm compares to your jmp when you compare the two :)

                  • avatar
                    #44 written by Atomic'76
                    about 3 months ago

                    For sure! I know the circuits are VERY similar especially since my JCM is an early one from 1983 but I’ve also been told that there are differences in the rectifier as well as some resistance values. I think the JPM definitely has more treble by nature though. I get VERY close to AC/DC tone with the JCM. The JCM 800 is an awesome amp too compared to the 900 and ones that have come after.

                    • avatar
                      #45 written by Ant
                      about 3 months ago

                      has it arrived?

                    • avatar
                      #46 written by Atomic'76
                      about 3 months ago

                      It should be here today or tomorrow. Hopefully today… :)

                  • avatar
                    #47 written by Atomic'76
                    about 2 months ago

                    Hey man! I’ve compared! Both sound wicked but the JMP is definitely helping me get a few more Angus squaks! lol For some reason it sounds a little more loose than the 800 (in a good way!) and the highs seem to ring out a lot more. Like when I do a D chord the notes seem to ring a lot brighter. There is a beautiful singing sustain when I do those big vibrato bends high on the neck too, even at relatively low volumes! It is a very classic sounding amp and you won’t go wrong getting one dude! My 800 has been looking a little sad sitting in the corner all by itself since my new friend came into the picture… lol Both are here to stay though.

                    • avatar
                      #48 written by Ant
                      about 2 months ago

                      glad it turned out good :)

                      same with my les paul guitar its been hanging on a wall mount since i got my newish SG lol

                      Happy Playing!

                    • avatar
                      #49 written by Atomic'76
                      about 2 months ago

                      Thanks!
                      Happy playing to you too buddy! :)

  • avatar
    #50 written by rockn roll man
    about 3 months ago

    I’ve never understood this: What do MK II and MK I mean on the retro of JMP heads???

    • avatar
      #51 written by NathanBrazil
      about 3 months ago

      I`v heard that MK means Mark…
      That`s it!! See ya!

      • avatar
        #52 written by rockn roll man
        about 3 months ago

        But, what does MARK mean? What is it???

        • avatar
          #53 written by Ryley
          about 3 months ago

          mark usually refers to different prototypes of various equipment. so marshall probably had a basic first model for the jmp that they called mark I, and the new and improved version would be mark II

        • avatar
          #54 written by Ant
          about 3 months ago

          Versioning would be another term for it :)

    • avatar
      #55 written by JaiminhoPagina
      about 3 months ago

      Well… As far as I know all the Marshalls from that era are MKII.

      MKI are probably just the first JTM45 prototypes from 1962 – 1963, so you won’t find many of them (I personally never seen a pic of a MKI).

      Some early Plexis have MKII on the faceplate (like the current reissues), then in 1968 they started putting “JMP” there instead, as the MKII was already implied, I guess. I think the MKII label reapeared in 1971 – 1972, but on the back.

      So basically it means nothing. It’s nothing to really worry about. :P

  • avatar
    #56 written by 06AngusSG
    about 4 months ago

    Hey, Just checked out the Member count.

    8) SOLODALLAS.COM HAS NOW SURPASSED 8,000 MEMBERS WITH A COUNT OF 8,003. 8)
    CONGRATULATIONS FIL!!!!!!!

  • avatar
    #57 written by OldSchoolRocker666
    about 4 months ago

    Haha i got one moment actually when they were celebrating the new year, people where firing rockets everywhere so i took the chance and cranked up my Marshall 100 watt 2203 amp to ten, though i didn’t boost it it was a blast, even for a halfstack, incridible to stand in front of it and do an A chord! I can’t wait to get the chance to blast it in a fullstack mode when i get a straight cabinet for it :D

    Reason i could finaly crank it is because they were firing rockets there would be sound everywhere so people wouldn’t be bothered and rarely does one get a chance to crank these amps loud enough and i couldn’t resist the chance to ”blast the new year in” :D

    So it was no attenuator, and both volume knobs on ten and the whole room shook.

    • avatar
      #58 written by Atomic'76
      about 4 months ago

      It IS quite overwhelming isn’t it! :)
      I used to have a hand wired (point to point) HIWATT custom 50.
      Something about handwired amps seems to make them louder than others, maybe the more direct circuit or something. It was like thunder in my living room man! Anyway, that thing was the loudest amp I’ve ever had by far! I could literally feel my pants moving from the sheer power coming out of the speakers! Seriously, it was dizzying playing it full blast but oh so much fun!!! :) I had a 100 watt JCM 2000 later that still was not as loud as that thing! I think at one point our ears and brains can only register so many decibels! LOL Everybody should get to crank their amp at some point wouldn’t you agree?

    • avatar
      #59 written by banane
      about 4 months ago

      Hehe, did the same here, put myself in front of the cab and put the amp on full blast with attenuator off. Incredible feeling! :D

      • avatar
        #60 written by Atomic'76
        about 4 months ago

        On day I’ll have to borrow a friends 4×12 so I can try it out with two cabs, stacked of course for full effect! lol Having your amp controls at eye level must be a cool feeling!

        • avatar
          #61 written by OldSchoolRocker666
          about 4 months ago

          Yeah it is a blast, i have only done it one more time and that was the first time i got it home and the reactions from those at home was not very possitive to say the least :D

          But i can at least play it at high volume at some times but not cranked it to high, i allmost never have it above 2 on the master. I can have it up to two from time to time if i just plan it with the others to play it a certein amount of time , you know asking like ”i’am gonna play on the guitar and use the amp is that okey if i rise the volume for a while so i can experiment and make some few covers and exersize?” and mostly it is okey if i just don’t do it late on the evening :)

          I gotta get a non slanted cab myself as well, i feel the slanted cab isn’t making the sound as full and big as i’d like to so i will get a new cabinet to make a fullstack.

          But i wont crank a full stack at home, i’am trying to see if there is some place to be at to be able to do just that, if a halfstack is so loud then imagine how loud a fullstack is! :D

      • avatar
        #62 written by OldSchoolRocker666
        about 4 months ago

        By the way i might need help with someone to approve a post i have written, can you approve it mate? :)

        • avatar
          #63 written by banane
          about 4 months ago

          While I’m rather not for discussing music news here, this is an exception. Have something similar in mind, will come shortly. Posting approved.

  • avatar
    #64 written by dimndav
    about 4 months ago

    I am trying to “TUNE” my 1984 SG standard bridge pickup. I use the low E post as a starting point, level with the cover. Then raise the screw a little on the A and a little more for the D. Slightly less than the D is the G and then a lot less for the B (below the cover) then ending with the high E about level with the cover. Sounds pretty good but I am wondering what others do….Plus I am curios how far away from the stings do you place the pick-ups?

    • avatar
      #65 written by Atomic'76
      about 4 months ago

      I’ve never touched those little screws on my pickups. I guess as you seem to know they are for fine tuning so you can get equal volume or output for all strings. As for spacing between the pickup and the strings, I read somewhere that Angus put his fairly high (close to the strings) because it gives sort of a percussive sound when he would attack the strings. The guy who set up my guitar has them only a few millimeters from the strings. I don’t know if you use your neck pickup much but it is important too to balance them so that when you switch from one pickup to the other there is not too much of a difference in volume. That is not so much measured by distance but my sound which means by ear.

  • avatar
    #66 written by rockn roll man
    about 4 months ago

    What is better to play LIVE/STUDIO?
    -a JMP Marshall 100 watt?
    -a JMP Marshall 50 watt?
    I’d like to buy a Marshall head for all the events but I need (before) this information I’ve written in this question.
    Thank you

    • avatar
      #67 written by Atomic'76
      about 4 months ago

      I think either of those will do both those jobs really well. Personally I don’t see the “need” for a 100 watt amp anymore. I used to have one and honestly it was way more power than what I needed. I have since bought a 50 watt amp and even that is more than powerful enough! A lot of that great tone comes from cranking the hell out of these things. Without an attenuator a 50 or 100 watt amp will shake the pictures off the walls in your house at full volume which brings me to the point of, why have all that power if you’re just going to soak it with an attenuator? Even for stage use, everything is mic’d anyway so it’s not like you need all that power to fill the room. I just had an 18 watt tube amp built for me which is basically a copy of a mid sixties Marshall 18 watt (model 1974??) and at full volume it is plenty loud enough to play with a band PLUS I get all that fat, punchy tube tone and can be in the same room without my ears bleeding! Best amp I’ve had yet and I’ve owned a few. It is definitely a little AC/DC machine and covers many other tones too! :) So to answer your question… I would get a 50 watt JMP if you feel you absolutely have to choose one or the other.

      • avatar
        #68 written by rockn roll man
        about 4 months ago

        But… if I wanted to use an amp (Marshall JMP) in a small LIVE situation it wouldn’t be better with a stack: 2 cabs and a 100 watt head?
        And do you believe that in a Studio record a 100 watt amp is a DISASTER?

        • avatar
          #69 written by Dries
          about 4 months ago

          Yes. In 90% of the live situations the pa guys won’t start before you turn the amp quiet. The onstage volume just can’t be high in most of the situations, else any other instrument on stage must be amplified louder than yourself, and everything gets louder, and louder…

          • avatar
            #70 written by rockn roll man
            about 4 months ago

            So, in your opinion is better a 50 watt head with 2 cabs, really? And I would like your opinion in a STUDIO situation. thank you

            • avatar
              #71 written by Atomic'76
              about 4 months ago

              You don’t “need” two cabs.
              And try a few amps out before you decide on one in particular. I know everyone talks about JMP’s and all but there might be something else (a tube amp of course) that will suit your needs more. I’ve heard that a lot of guitarists use smaller powered amps in the studio some even a Marshall Class 5 (5 watts!!!) or little boutique amps or several different kinds of amps. Get something that you can achieve the sound you want at a volume that doesn’t piss your band mates and neighbors off.

              • avatar
                #72 written by Ryley
                about 4 months ago

                just bought myself a class 5 head! AMAZING amp for the money!

                • avatar
                  #73 written by Atomic'76
                  about 4 months ago

                  I totally agree man! Very portable too!!! ;)

                  I had one of the first versions that came out but the tube rattle problem drove me nuts so I sold it but I understand they have corrected that now.

                  It really is a mini plexi when it is full blast isn’t it!

                  • avatar
                    #74 written by Ryley
                    about 4 months ago

                    yep i got mine brand new straight from england :D had a good ol’ fashioned rock out last night XD i also have a marshall mg100hcfx solid state 100W amp and the class 5 at 7 (volume) is the same as about 4 on the 100W. so i find it water amazing that a 5 watt tube amp is roughly the equivalent to 40 some-odd solid state watts. helps running it through a 4×12 though! it’s my first tube amp so I’m extremely pumped to find out more about what the class 5 can really do :)

                    • avatar
                      #75 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      rather** XD damn apple auto correct

                    • avatar
                      #76 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Haha! I knew what you meant! ;)

                    • avatar
                      #77 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Yep it’s amazing how loud they are especially on a 4×12! Throw a little boost pedal in front and it is just screaming! Might be worth using an EQ pedal too. I have an MXR ten band eq pedal and that does the trick for boosting my amp AND dialing in different tones. If you get the Kerry King model of the MXR M-108 it has two output jacks so you can split you signal into your Class 5 and your MG at the same time. Just a thought… lol The only difference between the Kerry King model and the standard M-108 is the graphics that are painted on it and the fact that it has two outputs where the standard has only one.

                • avatar
                  #78 written by Atomic'76
                  about 4 months ago

                  Cool thing about the head version is you can plug it into 8 or 16 ohm load unlike the combo which is stuck at 16 only.

                  • avatar
                    #79 written by Ryley
                    about 4 months ago

                    whats the difference between 8 and 16 ohm loads? probably a dumb question but like how do i know how many ohms my cab is? i’ve tried looking it up on the internet but haven’t found much info.. i think it has eminence 12ax75 speakers?

                    • avatar
                      #80 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Your cab doesn’t say on the back what the impedance is? There should be a little plate there with some info on it. Cabs are usually 4, 8 or 16 ohms resistance. It is important to match the resistance of the cab with what your amp is pushing. It can vary in cabs. If the speakers are wired in series then you just add up the resistance of each speaker to get the total. If they are wired in parallel then it is a bit different. There is a formula (not a complicated one) if I’m not mistaken it is the ohms of one of the speakers divided by the number of speakers. In my case, in my combo I have two 16 ohm speakers wired in parallel so I have to set the switch on the back of my amp to 8 ohms since 16 divided by 2 = 8. If you had a 4×12 with four 16 ohm speakers in it you would have 16 / 4 = 4 which means your amp would have to be set to 4 ohms. Then you get another wiring type called series/parallel which is a combination of the two. So in a 4 x 12 situation with four 16 ohm speakers you would get two sets of two wired in parallel to giving two set of 8 ohms that would then be wired together in series to get a total of 16 ohms. There are a few ways to wire a cab depending on these things. To answer your question though, if you want to find the resistance of your cab just plug the speaker cable into the cab and use a multimeter set to ohms on the other end to find what it is. It might not show exactly as 8 or 16, it might be 7.79 or 15.7 or whatever but that is ok. You basically want it as close as possible so if it reads 15.7 you want your amp to be set at 16 and not 4 or 8 obviously. The tip of the wire is + so just touch the end of the red lead from your multimeter to it and the black lead to the side of the shaft to get the reading. If you get the colors backwards it’s okay it will just read as a – on the meter but will be the same number. Hope that helps. I would find out though so you don’t eventually damage the power tube and transformer in your amp.

                    • avatar
                      #81 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      ahh alright! thanks a lot for your answer, ill go have a look, thank god my dad’s got a couple of those meters XD

                    • avatar
                      #82 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      you were right about the plate! never noticed it before seeing as my cab has been sitting up against a wall for 2 and a half years XD only bought my two heads recently so i never really looked! 8 ohms sir! i had my class 5 plugged into 16 ohms the other day and i thought it sounded better for some reason?

                    • avatar
                      #83 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      I’m pretty sure the that head has a switch so you can use one or the other. It won’t hurt it if you have it plugged into the wrong one for a while but after prolonged use that way it could have some effect on the amp. There is a difference in sound for sure when set at 8 or 16 ohms. I think the lower the ohms the harder the amp has to work to push the speakers so that changes to sound a bit. Of course the cab and speakers themselves will change the sound a lot too. I guess it’s a matter of preference when it comes down to it.

                    • avatar
                      #84 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      sounds exactly, seems in the 8 ohm setting, the amp is fighting a lot more than 16 ohm.. ill be experimenting a bit over the next little while

                    • avatar
                      #85 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Just make absolutely sure that whatever tube amp you are using it is ALWAYS plugged into some sort of speaker! lol Better to have the wrong load than no load because that is a SURE way to F#@! your amp right up!
                      Hey Ryley where are you from anyway?

                    • avatar
                      #86 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      from canada my friend :) what’s your name btw? if u don’t mind me asking of course

                    • avatar
                      #87 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      My name is Chris. I live in Sherbrooke, Quebec my fellow Canuck! What province are you from?

                    • avatar
                      #88 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      ahh right on man! I’m from windsor, southern most city in ontario :)

                    • avatar
                      #89 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Don’t think I’ve ever been as far as Windsor. Furthest I’ve gone down that way is Niagara Falls, Welland, Port Colborne area. Have a couple friends from there and who moved there though. I wonder how many others here are form Canada? By the way Sherbrooke is about an hour and a half East of Montreal not far from the Vermont border.

                    • avatar
                      #90 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      very nice! yea i wonder that too.. lots of american and euro folks i’ve noticed :) ANY OTHER CANUCKS HERE ON SD? :D

                    • avatar
                      #91 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Do you have a band?

                    • avatar
                      #92 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      nope flyin solo at the present moment :P hby?

                    • avatar
                      #93 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Got a band but haven’t been playing with them for a while now. Unfortunately “life” gets in the way sometimes. :(

                      Been mainly playing at home on my own for a while now, trying to record some ideas of my own and stuff. I’m due to get back with them though I can tell you that! They’re a cool bunch of guys, they have another guitar player now but they tell me I am welcome back whenever I’m ready.

                    • avatar
                      #94 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      thats great chris :) good for you. i’ve tried to start bands before but they rarely get past the preliminary stage because its very rare to find people who play and enjoy classic and hard rock like i do… seems every guitar player i come across is either punk/pop or metal

                    • avatar
                      #95 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Yeah it’s hard to find people that it “clicks” with. It’s also hard to find people who really listen when they jam with others. I’ve played with people before who are really technically good but they can’t jam with others or improvise for shit! If someone makes a mistake while playing you can’t just stop the song and you can’t just keep going playing your own thing. You have to be able to adapt and jump back into it (with a smile too!) and you can only do that if you are really listening to everyone else which unfortunately many do not do. I played bass in a band for a while and the drummer we had was awesome at that. We were always in tune with each other because we were always paying attention and focusing on grooving together above all else. We had to, we were the backbone of the band! If your rhythm section is tight it makes it easier for the rest to fall into place. Or so I’ve noticed. :)

                    • avatar
                      #96 written by Ryley
                      about 4 months ago

                      nope I’m totally with ya on that one. I’m actually in school taking a class based around that right now: working together, listening to you’re band members and adding what you can or simply not playing at all if it fits :P i am still learning of course, but then again, when do we stop learning to improve, when do we stop picking up new tips and tricks? :P guitar is one thing that takes a life time to get really good at and even then there are still things to learn. after only 5 years of playing i consider myself to be a fairly savvy guitarist, but faarr from greaatt XD look me up on Facebook man! Ryley Gallwey (guitar with a beard and a girl to his left!)

                    • avatar
                      #97 written by Atomic'76
                      about 4 months ago

                      Will do man. I’ll add you to my FB right now.

            • avatar
              #98 written by Dries
              about 4 months ago

              ONE good amp and ONE cabinet. and in current studio situations, you are better of with a small amp. Like a boutique hanwired valve amp.

        • avatar
          #99 written by Atomic'76
          about 4 months ago

          For a small live situation one 4×12 cab is enough or even a combo amp. Having two 4×12 cabs is just overkill man. I’d say that the only reason you see bands with twenty 4×12 cabs on stage is for show. I wouldn’t be surprised if most of the cabs are empty! I saw ZZ Top once at an outdoor venue where there were several bands playing and watched the roadies toss an Orange 4×12 cab up on top of another like it weighed 5 pounds! It was almost blowing over in the wind! Don’t try to convince me there were speakers in that thing! Point being is the amp companies probably give all these to bands like AC/DC and ZZ Top or whoever because they know guys like us will see them and want to have them because they do. Anyway, buy what you want but keep in mind that you have to carry all that shit around with you. And seriously a 50 watt amp is more than enough power for anything you’ll want to do.

          • avatar
            #100 written by rockn roll man
            about 4 months ago

            I’m a stupid, sorry… You’re a friend!
            OK, I’ll look for a 50 watt head and a 4X12 cab.
            Thank you for the help
            PS: Now, I have a Marshall Valvestate 20 watt (8020).

            • avatar
              #101 written by Atomic'76
              about 4 months ago

              You’re not stupid.
              I would love to have a full stack too a) because it sounds great and b) because it looks so damn cool!

              Your valvestate probably sounds pretty good but wait until you finally plug into your all tube head and 4×12. It WILL blow you away!

              Good luck with your amp hunt! :)

  • avatar
    #102 written by rockn roll man
    about 4 months ago

    I need an information: Watch HIGH WATTAGE article.
    Thank you for the help

  • avatar
    #103 written by OldSchoolRocker666
    about 4 months ago

    I’am not sure where to post this, but what do people around here think about Motörhead? Is that Rock’n'roll?
    Is it not? If so or not, why and how?

    Does the speed of Motörhead makes it less Rock’n'roll?

    Should it be cathegorized as Rock’n'roll? (Lemmy even himself doesn’t even classify himself as metalhead or Motörhead as a metal band but Rock’n'roll).

    What do you people think?

    Just wanted to start an funny disgussion :)

    • avatar
      #104 written by Devil'Fingers"
      about 4 months ago

      Well friend, I may not be objective now, but I personally love motorhead and I DO classify them as rock and roll in some way. They style is very hard, but in my opinion it’s a big up! You know, when I hear ac/dc I can “smell” that rock and roll in the very inside, and it is covered with blues, some hard rock, some maybe even metal – and so does motorhead – rock and roll covered with dirty metal and stuff. You know, one of the things that are most cool abour rnr is the attitude. Motorhead ( ac/dc too :D ) definetely got it.
      Oh , and I classify band as rock and roll, when it has potential to make you swing, drive you from inside , you know, and one more time motorhead got it.
      My little question ( it goes to philosophy now :D ), what is the , ummm essence of rock and roll, what is it??
      “[...]it’s like infinity rock and roll!” Bon about ac/dc :D
      Good thread ! big up

    • avatar
      #105 written by HumanJHawkins
      about 4 months ago

      Not sure, but I hesitate to put music into any category. If the music is good, a single category usually doesn’t do it justice. Though I get it that categories are very convenient.

      • avatar
        #106 written by OldSchoolRocker666
        about 4 months ago

        Allright, but now to another question, can Motörhead and AC/DC sound/style be mixed together?

        Imagine if we take both their styles, like pre 80s ACDC and early Motörhead albums or maybe mid albums like Orgasmatron, or the earliest ones, mix the amps, the way the guitarists, basses, drums e.t.c are played and melt it together, 50% Motörhead and 50% ACDC, who could it sound like and could it fit melted together somehow?

        Imagine if Lemmy would make some sort of colaboration or project with ACDC, you know, a Rock’n'roll project to make for a raw sounding, Rock’n'roll attiduded, screamingly loud Rock’n'roll sound for an album in their early years, and make that raw in-your-face kind of sound, imagine how it could have sounded like :)

    • avatar
      #107 written by Atomic'76
      about 4 months ago

      It’s funny how music can change “categories” at least in my mind. 30 years ago Iron Maiden and Judas Priest were considered “Heavy Metal”, AC/DC and Aerosmith “Hard Rock”, Stevie Ray Vaughn “Blues”. It’s all rock and roll to me! Listen to Maiden, they aren’t doing anything different than any other group. How they do it might be different but all or most of their solos are blues based. Even Dave Mustaine (Megadeth for those of you who don’t know) sticks really close to minor pentatonic blues scales for his solos. What makes it metal anyway? More distortion? Faster picking? Dark lyrics? That “forbidden triad” that they used to believe invokes Satan?! lol

      • avatar
        #108 written by OldSchoolRocker666
        about 4 months ago

        I hope you’re not bashing Heavy Metal.. And no, just because a guitarist uses minor pentatonic blues scales doesn’t make him less metal because of that if it fits into the music. Iron Maiden and Judas Priest = Heavy Metal no matter what you say..

        When i play in metal style of way i use minor pentatonics and similar scales because that works for me, i don’t need to use super complicated scales and certingly doesn’t the bands mentioned have the need for it if they don’t want to..

        No offence but it just looks like you bash Heavy Metal or something.

        • avatar
          #109 written by Atomic'76
          about 4 months ago

          Haha! No way man! I love all kinds of music! I love Maiden, Priest, Metallica, Slayer you name it! I was saying that metal or rock or whatever all comes from the same roots I don’t care what anyone says and that you can call it “metal” but it all fits into good rock to me. Priest even has a song called Rocka-Rolla. I was in no way saying that any of those bands are “less metal” than any others. I guess I consider a lot of those groups classic rock now even if they did or do fit into the metal genre. I guess I should chose my words more carefully! No offense taken dude and none intended.

          • avatar
            #110 written by OldSchoolRocker666
            about 4 months ago

            Lol sorry man i have to deal with people quite often who hate and bash heavy metal it gets hard sometimes to distinguish jokes apart from bashing, sorry man :)

            • avatar
              #111 written by Atomic'76
              about 4 months ago

              It’s all good man. Speaking of dealing with people and their heavy metal comments. I bought my Gibson Explorer about a little over 15 years ago and have been dealing with “oh look at that heavy metal guitar” comments ever since. Not that I’m ashamed! :) I tell them that the Explorer and Flying V were invented in 1958 before there was such a thing as metal and that it is just an awesome guitar for any playing style but most don’t get it, at least the ones who aren’t musicians don’t anyway.
              On the topic of rock and metal… what would you consider the Beatles song Helter Skelter? That is a pretty heavy song!

              • avatar
                #112 written by OldSchoolRocker666
                about 4 months ago

                Again i’am deeply sorry for judging like i did, it was very late in the night and i was tired while i wrote it and when i’am tired my judgement is bad, and i tries to avoid having ”fights” with people but anyways i’am sorry for judging and not seeing first your point :)

                Yeah most people probubly consider them ”metal-guitars” but didn’t Albert King use one long before KK Downings(Judas Priest guitarist) and James Hethfield (Metallica) used theirs?

                And i agree the SG models has something about them, they’re obviously mostly good for acdc kind of music but they can work great in most types of music, maybe not death, black metal or screamo kind of music and the like but i think they can work when playing metal as well from time to time :)

                And yeah the song seems pretty heavy for not being a ”rock” or ”metal” song, nice song :)

                • avatar
                  #113 written by Atomic'76
                  about 4 months ago

                  Yeah I think Albert King used one as well as a Flying V. There are clips of Clapton playing one too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lVCYaKxCrw
                  There are also Allen Collins, Billy Gibbons, The Edge, Gary Moore and Ace Frehley to name a few. The Explorer is definitely a big chunk of mahogany too so lots of room for resonance.
                  If you like hard rock or metal maybe you’d like these guys. They’re from Montreal, Canada. They’re called Priestess. Here’s a youtube link:
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa2gg7Qwuew
                  An SG AND and an Expolorer! :)
                  Once again man, no worries, it’s easy for comments to be misinterpreted sometimes!
                  Let me know what you think of Priestess too!
                  Later! :)

            • avatar
              #114 written by Atomic'76
              about 4 months ago

              By the way! I still have that Explorer though admittedly it does spend more time in it’s case since I got my SG! :)

  • avatar
    #115 written by rockn roll man
    about 5 months ago

    I need an information: I’d like to record…. watch “THE DEFINITIVE BACK IN BLACK FEATURING…”. I’ve an important question there…
    Thank you

  • avatar
    #116 written by Johnny
    about 5 months ago

    Hey fil hows it goin, ive got a question for ya…how do i determine the exact year of my guitar?? i recently bought a 1970 sg, and when i checked the serial # on a website, it said 1970, 71, or 72 is when my sg was made. Any help would be appreciated, thanks :)

  • avatar
    #117 written by Anje
    about 5 months ago

    Hi Fil!

    I’ve just joined, finally! can’t believe I waited all this time before doing so; really looking forward digging in the lots of great articles and other media you put in this such cool site.
    Thanks for sharing the passion, long live the love for great tone and music.
    Hope to talk to you soon.

    Jean

Post a new comment

You must be logged in to post a comment or a video response.

No trackbacks yet.